Assignment 2 Case study review
The research topic I chose is about ‘learner readiness’. The chosen describes academic staff being the reluctant learners. This online journal is about the importance of academic teaching staff undertaking continuing professional development, and the consequences of effective change management strategies for embedding online learning within higher education. It also includes reasons for inadequacies in online learning such as funding, teaching staff lack of skills, why some academic staff is reluctant to continue in professional development and how these factors impact on the learners.
Knowledge is ‘power’, it affects all aspects of our lives and the “global nature of our society” (Goolnik, 2006, p1), and the way information technology “…enables the rapid exchange of information, and networking…” (cited in Goolnik, 2006, p1). Technology has had an effect on higher education, student numbers have increased, and running expenses are greater however government funding have not matched those increases. In the
United Kingdom, universities are encouraged to use new technologies to acquire funds, making them less reliant on public funding.
Universities have to make changes in the way they deliver their courses, moving away from traditional methods and practices. Students will have greater control in their learning with teachers having less. The teachers’ role is becoming more of a facilitator rather than a ‘teacher’. Therefore, educational staffs have to adopt new innovative strategies, allowing for learning that is more flexible. However many academics are reluctant to change, due to deficiencies in resources and facilities to undertake new approaches, inadequate technical and administrative support. If the above concerns are addressed resistance to change is likely to be conquered.
According to Ehrman, (2002) Lathchem and Hanna (2001), forming a central working group involving all educational stakeholders from senior to student bodies allows communication opportunities to address various institutional, departmental and personal visions. This will allow discussions on polices and procedures currently in place regarding the above mentioned concerns including appropriate continuing professional development strategies for online learning. There is now a greater emphasis on continuing professional development regarding “…pedagogical techniques within a technology enhanced arena” (Goolnik, 2006, p3) this will address the shortfalls of information and communications technology skills which academic staff require.
In conclusion, research studies show that academic staff concerns need to be acknowledge by management and their efforts appreciated. The establishment of a coordinating body representative, with all the main stakeholders, communicate in matters of importance in continuing professional development. When teachers are better equipped with the knowledge and skills through continuing professional development it allows their students a greater, more sustainable learning experience.
The journal includes more in-depth details of the above-mentioned problems. I found this an interesting read because in my opinion it relates to academic staff universally.
Marianna P. Brice compiled this review from
http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde21/articles/goolnik.htm